Date: 2010-02-27 11:16 pm (UTC)
Read the bottom of the "Blue Discharge" article. After 47, it was an "undesirable" discharge. Not the same as a dishonorable discharge, but not a general discharge.

"A general discharge was considered to be under honorable conditions – which is distinct from an "honorable discharge" – and an undesirable discharge was under conditions other than honorable – which, again, is distinct from a "dishonorable discharge".[1] At the same time, however, the Army changed its regulations to ensure that gay and lesbian service members would not qualify for general discharges.[28] Under this system, a service member found to be homosexual but not to have committed any homosexual acts while in-service would receive an undesirable discharge. Those who were found guilty of engaging in homosexual conduct were dishonorably discharged."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blue_discharge#Aftermath

I am a lesbian, and while I didn't study gay history in school, I have done a lot of reading. I <3 history and I love the stories of people who existed between the lines. The blog Gay for Today (http://gayfortoday.blogspot.com/) has brief biographies of gay people throughout history, some really interesting stories there.

BTW, you heard that David O Stiers came out a few years ago? Really cool, Charles-like interview here: http://www.gossip-boy.com/DOS.html
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

mash_slash: (Default)
M*A*S*H Slash

October 2012

S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
2829 3031   

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 7th, 2025 05:34 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios